You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 2 The comparison of Potential of Mean Force profiles obtained from ASMD simulations and energy profiles from single structure or averaged CaverDock calculations over snapshots from MD simulations

From: Large-scale annotation of biochemically relevant pockets and tunnels in cognate enzyme–ligand complexes

Case

Enzyme

Ligand

Number of tunnels

Match with static CaverDock

Match with averaged CaverDock

System #1 (PDB ID 1OTW)

Pyrroloquinoline–quinone synthase

Pyrrolo-quinoline quinone

3

1 out of 3

1 out of 3

System #2 (PDB ID 2BFN)

Haloalkane dehalogenase LinB

trans-3-Chloro-2-propene-1-ol

3

3 out of 3

3 out of 3

System #3 (PDB ID 2RFY)

Cellobiohydrolase

Cellobiose

3

0 out of 3

1 out of 3

System #4 (PDB ID 2UWH)

Cytochrome P450 BM3

11,14,15-Trihydroxyicosatrienoic acid

3

2 out of 3

3 out of 3

System #5 (PDB ID 4E2Z)

C-3′-methyltransferase

Se-adenosyl-l-selenohomocysteine

3

3 out of 3

3 out of 3

System #6 (PDB ID 5EDT)

Cytochrome P450 CYP121

(4S)-4-(5,5-Dimethylcyclohex-1-en-1-yl) cyclohex-1-ene-1-carboxylate

4

0 out of 4

0 out of 4

System #7 (PDB ID 3ORW)

Phosphotriesterase

N-(6-Aminohexanoyl)-6-aminohexanoate

2

2 out of 2

2 out of 2

System #8 (PDB ID 5U6M)

UDP-glucosyltransferase

Uridine 5′-diphosphate

3

3 out of 3

3 out of 3